Sigma vs Power BI Pricing and Cost Per User for a 25 Person Team
Power BI prints a $14 seat price. Sigma prints none on its own site. Here is what each costs for 25 and 100 people, where Power BI capacity overtakes seats, and what a flat plan costs instead.
Ask the demo shop a question, or type your own:
Reading the schema, writing SQL… Writing SQL… Running (read‑only)… SQL AgentSQL wrote
▋
A real MySQL shop: customers, products, orders and signups over the last year. AgentSQL writes the SQL, runs it read-only, and answers.
Power BI costs $14 per user per month on Pro. Sigma publishes no price at all, and the only public Sigma list price is $150,000 for the platform plus $2,000 per Creator or Explorer on its AWS Marketplace listing. For a 25 person team that is about $4,200 a year against roughly $160,000, so these two tools are not priced for the same buyer.
Most pages that compare the two skip the arithmetic, because Sigma will not give a number. This one does it from what is printed: Microsoft's own pricing page for Power BI and Sigma's own listing on AWS Marketplace. Where a figure is a reported contract average and not a list price, it says so.
What each vendor actually prints
| Item | Power BI | Sigma Computing |
|---|---|---|
| Entry seat | $14 per user a month (Pro, paid yearly) | No price on sigmacomputing.com |
| Top per-user tier | $24 per user a month (Premium Per User) | Creator and Explorer add-ons at $2,000 a year each (AWS listing) |
| Platform fee | None for per-user licensing | $150,000 for 12 months (AWS listing, includes 24/7 support) |
| Viewers | Need a Pro license unless content is on F64 or larger capacity | Viewer add-on $0.00 (AWS listing) |
| Reported real contracts | Not applicable | Median $65,080 across 153 purchases, range $17,060 to $146,240 (Vendr) |
Our own Power BI pricing breakdown and Sigma pricing page hold the full tables, including Sigma's four license tiers and the Fabric capacity ladder. The Microsoft figures come from the Power BI pricing page, and the Sigma median from Vendr's Sigma page.
Worked example: 5 builders and 20 viewers
Take a 25 person team where 5 people build reports and 20 only read them. This is the most common shape we see, and the one where the numbers separate fastest.
| Setup | Monthly | Yearly |
|---|---|---|
| Power BI Pro for all 25 (25 x $14) | $350 | $4,200 |
| Power BI Premium Per User for 5 builders, Pro for 20 viewers (5 x $24 + 20 x $14) | $400 | $4,800 |
| Sigma at AWS list ($150,000 + 5 Creators x $2,000, viewers $0) | Annual contract | $160,000 |
| Sigma at the Vendr median contract | Annual contract | $65,080 |
| AgentSQL Team (10 seats), billed yearly | $59 | $708 |
Even if you assume Sigma lands at the Vendr median instead of list, it is about 15 times the Power BI Pro bill. At list it is 38 times. No discount closes that gap for a team this size. The AgentSQL row is not a like-for-like swap, it is the cost of the narrower job of asking plain-English questions of a database.
Worked example: 100 users, 15 builders and 85 viewers
Here Power BI offers a second path. Fabric capacity at F64 or above lets people read Power BI content without a paid per-user license, and Microsoft's reserved rate for F64 is about $5,002.67 a month on the site's verified table. Builders still need a Pro seat to author, so the capacity route costs 15 x $14 plus the capacity.
| Setup | Monthly | Yearly |
|---|---|---|
| Power BI Pro for all 100 | $1,400 | $16,800 |
| F64 reserved plus 15 Pro builders | $5,212.67 | $62,552 |
| Sigma at AWS list ($150,000 + 15 Creators x $2,000) | Annual contract | $180,000 |
| AgentSQL Scale (100 seats), billed yearly | $179 | $2,148 |
The crossover is simple division. F64 at $5,002.67 a month equals 357 Pro seats at $14, so per-user licensing wins until you have more than about 357 people who only read. Below that, buying capacity to save on viewers costs more, not less. Capacity makes sense for other reasons, mainly Copilot, which we cover in Power BI Copilot license requirements.
When Sigma is still the right buy
Sigma is a spreadsheet-style interface that runs directly on Snowflake, Databricks or BigQuery, and it can write input back to the warehouse. If a finance or operations team lives in spreadsheets, wants live warehouse data in every cell and has hundreds of viewers, the $0 Viewer add-on changes the arithmetic. At 1,000 viewers Power BI Pro is $168,000 a year, which is close to Sigma's list price, and viewer count is the one dimension where Sigma's model gets cheaper per head.
It is also a warehouse-first tool, while Power BI is strongest in Microsoft shops. If your company runs on Microsoft 365, Entra ID and Teams, Power BI is the lower-friction choice. If your data team already standardised on Snowflake and has budget for a platform, Sigma is a serious option. We compared Sigma with another quote-only BI platform in ThoughtSpot vs Sigma pricing.
What to ask for in a Sigma quote
- Which license model applies, the older Lite, Essential and Pro tiers or the View, Act, Analyze and Build tiers.
- Whether the platform fee scales with warehouse usage or is a fixed amount for 12 months.
- The price of each additional Creator and Explorer, and whether Viewer is still $0.
- What happens to price at renewal if you add 10 builders mid-term.
For Power BI, ask Microsoft or your reseller the same renewal question about Pro list price changes, and confirm whether you need Premium Per User for large semantic models.
If the need is answers, not a BI platform
Many teams that start this comparison do not need governed dashboards. They need a head of sales or an ops manager to get a number from the database without filing a request. That is a different job, and a flat plan covers it: AgentSQL connects read-only to PostgreSQL, MySQL, Snowflake or BigQuery, takes a question in plain English and returns a chart, a table and the SQL. Team is $59 a month billed yearly for 10 seats. The broader market is laid out in our business intelligence software pricing comparison.
Whichever way you go, the dashboard is only as trustworthy as the revenue numbers feeding it. Creators and sellers who collect payouts from several platforms can reconcile them in Earnly first, so the totals that reach the BI tool are clean.
Bottom line
Budget Power BI from its printed $14 seat, $4,200 a year for 25 people, and treat Sigma as a five or six-figure platform contract negotiated by quote. Pick Sigma for warehouse-native spreadsheet work with a very large viewer base, and Power BI for nearly everyone else.
›_ frequently asked
Common questions
- Is Sigma more expensive than Power BI?
- Yes, by a wide margin on published numbers. Power BI Pro is $14 per user a month, so 25 users cost $4,200 a year. Sigma lists no price on its website, and its AWS Marketplace listing starts at a $150,000 platform fee plus $2,000 per Creator or Explorer. Vendr reports a median Sigma contract of $65,080.
- How much does Power BI cost for 100 users?
- With 100 Pro licenses, Power BI costs $1,400 a month, or $16,800 a year, at the $14 list price. Fabric capacity at F64 and above lets viewers read reports without a paid license, but F64 is about $5,002.67 a month on a reservation, so seats stay cheaper until you have roughly 357 viewers.
- Does Sigma charge for viewers?
- On Sigma's AWS Marketplace listing the Viewer add-on is $0.00, while Creator and Explorer add-ons are $2,000 each for a 12 month contract. Sigma's docs now describe View, Act, Analyze and Build license tiers and tell buyers to contact an account executive for prices, so check which model your quote uses.
- Which is better for a small team, Sigma or Power BI?
- For a team under 100 people Power BI is nearly always cheaper, because the entry price is a printed $14 seat and not a six-figure platform fee. Sigma earns its price when a data team wants spreadsheet-style analysis writing back to Snowflake, Databricks or BigQuery for a large number of viewers.
See AgentSQL write and run the SQL live.
Ask a question in plain English, watch the query appear, and get a chart and an answer with the SQL shown. Then point AgentSQL at your own database.
›_ keep reading